Principal Investigator : Emmanuel Bigand
Associates: Daniel
A. D'Adamo. Composer, LEAD-CNRS
François Madurell. Assistant professor in Music Theory. Université
Paris V Sorbonne
Benedicte Poulin. Ph.D. student, Cognitive Psychology
Tillmann Barbara. Ph.D., Cognitive
Psychology. LEAD CNRS & Dartmouth College
This project is supported by a research grant from the International
Foundation for Music Research.
Executive Director: Dr. Norman M. Weinberger
5790 Armanda Drive, Suite 200. Carlsbad, CA 92008. USA
Phone 760 438 5530
Email ifmr@music-research.org
Web site www.music-research.org
Overview of the project.
The main purpose of the project is to evaluate how musically naive
listeners differ from musically expert listeners when they are asked
to process musical structures. We postulate that listeners discover
musical events by focusing on successive zones. Within each of these
zones, they extract local relationships between sound events with
respect to evoked knowledge of Western musical grammar. The
result of this local analysis is then stored in working memory and
integrative processes relate these local structures in a
more or less coherent global form. The research program was designed
(1) to compare the musical knowledge of Western harmony in
musically expert and naive listeners and (2) to characterize the
nature and the power of the integrative processes in different
audiences (listeners) varying by familiarity with music. Although
it is likely that the musical cognitive abilities of nonmusicians
are generally underestimated, we are not expecting identical processing
of musical structures in nonmusicians and musicians. Differences
certainly exist but the critical point is to specify the exact nature
of these differences. We believe that a scientific account of this
issue may have implications for different domains of cognitive science,
for pedagogical methods, developments of music technology, and for
the musical behavior of the general audience.
Progress during the past year.
During the initial period, the research program was devoted to
(1) characterize the abstract musical knowledge of basic
regularities of western harmony in both musicians and nonmusicians
(2), to investigate how this knowledge influences the processing
of the harmonic function of a given chord in large contexts, and
(3) to analyze the understanding of musical discourse processes
in sonata forms.
1. Harmonic priming experiments have been run in order to probe
the harmonic knowledge of two-chord-relationships along the circle
of fifths, of the legal resolutions
of a diminished chord, and of the distance between major
keys. The used harmonic priming paradigm required listeners to evaluate
as quickly and accurately as possible whether or not a target chord
following a prime chord was acoustically consonant. Musicians and
nonmusicians showed a highly similar sensitivity to the different
kinds of harmonic relationships that have been experimentally manipulated
between prime and target chords. Further experiments are currently
running in order to evaluate whether the timbre of the sounds (piano
versus sine wave sounds) and the prime duration (varying from 75
ms to 300 ms) contribute to harmonic priming in both groups of listeners.
2. A second group of 12 experiments has investigated how listeners
understand the harmonic function of a target chord. In order to
maximize the chance to find differences between musicians and nonmusicians,
we voluntary decided to focus on very subtle differences in harmonic
function (i.e., tonic versus subdominant)
and to remove any contribution of the sensory driven processes in
the experiments. As a main outcome we found that the processing
of a chord depends on its harmonic function, even though the feature
of the target chord to be processed was not musical. For example,
the discrimination of the phonemes "dee"
and "doo" was facilitated when the phoneme was
sung on a tonic rather than on a subdominant chord. Experiments
currently running were designed to evaluate the speed to process
the contextual function of a chord. Up to now, nonmusicians behave
exactly as musicians do.
3. Finally, 4 experiments analyzed higher
levels of music cognition. Musical excerpts from Haydn,
Mozart and Beethoven sonatas were presented to listeners who were
asked to indicate whether these excerpts correspond to a musical
theme, a transition or an ending. After a training phase, participants
listened to a large set of excerpts that may be presented in an
incoherent way (i.e., the excerpts belong to different sonatas),
in a coherent way (i.e., the excerpts belong to the same sonata)
or in a pseudocoherent way (i.e., the excerpts belonging to a given
sonata are presented in a scrambled way). As a main result, musical
excepts were easier to categorize in the coherent and pseudo coherent
conditions rather than in the incoherent condition. Furthermore,
thematic sections were found to be more difficult to categorize
than musical transitions or endings. We currently run different
analyses in order to evaluate how each musical feature contributes
to the categorization of musical excerpts for both musicians and
nonmusicians.
Publications and meetings
Publications submitted concerning findings from the project
Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J. & Bigand, E. Implicit learning of
tonality: A self organizing approach. In press in Psychological
Review.
Tillmann, B., Bigand, E. Global contexts effects in normal versus
scrambled musical sequences. Submitted to Journal of Experimental
Psychology. Human, Perception & Performances.
Meetings concerning findings from this project.
Bigand, E.(2000) Psychologie de la musique et informatique musicale,
Journées d'Informatique Musicale, 18 Mai, Bordeaux.
Poulin, B., Bigand, E., D'Adamo, D., Madurell, F., & Tillmann,
B. (2000). Does musical expertise influence the processing of harmonic
structure ? , Poster presented at The Biological Foundations of
Music, New York Academy of Sciences Conference, May 20-22.
Bigand, E. & Tillmann, B. (2000). Harmonic and semantic priming:
Some comparisons, International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm,
Sweden, July, 23-29, .
Bigand, E., Poulain, B., D'Adamo, D., Madurell, F. & Tillmann,
B., More about the (weak) difference between musicians and nonmusicians's
abilities to process harmonic structures., 6th International Conference
on Music Perception and Cognition. August 5 10, Keele University,
United Kindom.
Bigand, E., Poulain, B., Tillmann, B & D'Adamo, D. How much
time do we need to process harmonic structures ?, 6th International
Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. August 5 10,
Keele University, United Kindom..
|