Predicting the progression of mild cognitive impairment using machine learning: A systematic, quantitative and critical review
Catégorie
Journal Article
Auteurs
Ansart, M., Epelbaum, S., Bassignana, G., Bône, A., Bottani, S., Cattai, T., Couronné, R., Faouzi, J., Koval, I., Louis, M., Thibeau-Sutre, E., Wen, J., Wild, A., Burgos, N., Dormont, D., Colliot, O., Durrleman, S.
Année
2021
Titre
Predicting the progression of mild cognitive impairment using machine learning: A systematic, quantitative and critical review
Journal / Livre / Conférence
Medical Image Analysis
Résumé
We performed a systematic review of studies focusing on the automatic prediction of the progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and a quantitative analysis of the methodological choices impacting performance. This review included 172 articles, from which 234 experiments were extracted. For each of them, we reported the used data set, the feature types, the algorithm type, performance and potential methodological issues. The impact of these characteristics on the performance was evaluated using a multivariate mixed effect linear regressions. We found that using cognitive, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography or potentially electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography variables significantly improved predictive performance compared to not including them, whereas including other modalities, in particular T1 magnetic resonance imaging, did not show a significant effect. The good performance of cognitive assessments questions the wide use of imaging for predicting the progression to AD and advocates for exploring further fine domain-specific cognitive assessments. We also identified several methodological issues, including the absence of a test set, or its use for feature selection or parameter tuning in nearly a fourth of the papers. Other issues, found in 15% of the studies, cast doubts on the relevance of the method to clinical practice. We also highlight that short-term predictions are likely not to be better than predicting that subjects stay stable over time. These issues highlight the importance of adhering to good practices for the use of machine learning as a decision support system for the clinical practice.
Volume
67
Pages
101848
Mots-clés
Cognition, Alzheimer's disease, Mild cognitive impairment, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, Progression, Automatic prediction, Quantitative review