Young children’s learning of relational categories: multiple comparisons and their cognitive constraints

Category

Journal Article

Authors

Thibaut, J.P, Witt, A.

Year

2015

Title

Young children’s learning of relational categories: multiple comparisons and their cognitive constraints

Journal / book / conference

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Relational categories are notoriously difficult to learn because they are not defined by intrinsic stable properties. We studied the impact of comparisons on relational concept learning with a novel word learning task in42-month-old children. Capitalizing on Gentner etal.(2011),two,threeorfourpairsofstimuliwereintroducedwithanovelrelationalword. In a given trial, the set of pairs was composed of either close or far pairs (e.g., close pair: knife1-watermelon, knife2-orange, knife3-slice of bread and knife4-meat; far pair: ax-evergreen tree, saw-log, cutter-cardboard, and knife-slice of bread, for the “cutter for” relation). Close pairs (2 vs. 3 vs. 4 pairs) led to random generalizations whereas comparisons with far pairs gave the expected relational generalization. The 3 pair case gave the best results. It is argued that far pairs promote deeper comparisons than close pairs. As shown by a control experiment, this was the case only when far pairs display well known associations.

Volume

6

Pages

643

Keywords

Cognitive Development, children, comparison, relational development, verbs

Download

Download this publication in PDF format

‹ Back