Effets de l’expertise dans la détection et l’analyse de défauts dans le domaine de la maintenance de matériel industriel complexe issu d’un secteur à risque
Catégorie
Conference Proceedings
Auteurs
Goutheraud, M., Boucheix, J-M., Drai-Zerbib, V., Carlini, A., Ansart, M., Paindavoine, M.
Année
2023
Titre
Effets de l’expertise dans la détection et l’analyse de défauts dans le domaine de la maintenance de matériel industriel complexe issu d’un secteur à risque
Journal / Livre / Conférence
Actes du colloque Paris, 5-7 Juillet 2023, IRBA, PARIS-Ecole du Val de Grâce
Résumé
Abstract
Middle school students’ use of sources to assess information reliability
Present study and hypotheses
Method
Results
Discussion
Expertas pero no persuasivas: la consideración de las fuentes por parte de los estudiantes de secundaria en el procesamiento de vídeos contradictorios
¿Cómo utilizan las fuentes los estudiantes de secundaria para evaluar la fiabilidad de la información?
Hipótesis y presente estudio
Método
Resultados
Discusión
Acknowledgements / Agradecimientos
Disclosure statement / Conflicto de intereses
ORCID
Data availability statement / Declaración de disponibilidad de datos
References / Referencias
Appendix 1. Arguments presented by the sources according to their position (positive/negatives)
Appendix 2. Distribution of participants’ prior beliefs, according to the experimental groups
Appendix 3. Credibility scales items (extracted from Stiff & Mongeau, 2016)
Appendix 4. Coding matrix used for categorizing written justifications
Appendix 5. Means and standard deviations observed on the main measures of the study
Apéndice 1. Argumentos presentados por las fuentes en función de su postura (positiva/negativa)
Apéndice 2. Distribución de las creencias previas, en función del grupo experimental
Apéndice 3. Ítems de la escala de credibilidad (extraídos de Stiff & Mongeau, 2016).
Apéndice 4. Matriz de codificación utilizada para categorizar las justificaciones escritas
Apéndice 5. Medias y desviaciones típicas observadas en las principales medidas del estudio
PDF / ePub
Cite article
Share options
Information, rights and permissions
Metrics and citations
Figures and tables
The purpose of this study was to better understand how middle school students consider the source of information when processing videos with conflicting information. To this end, we exposed a sample of seventh-graders to a series of videos in which two interviewees expressed divergent positions on a socioscientific issue (‘Will organic farming be able to feed the entire world population by 2050?’). After viewing the videos, students were asked to recall the sources they had seen and indicate how far they had perceived the sources to be credible and convincing. Results showed that students paid close attention to the information given about the sources during viewing and rated their credibility accordingly. However, only a minority of students rated the expert sources as the most convincing after viewing the videos, while students’ beliefs on the topic contributed to source evaluation. These results suggest that although middle school students may pay attention to the identity of sources when viewing a video, they are unlikely to use this information to assess the reliability of the message.
Pages
472-476
Mots-clés
Ergonomie Cognitive ; Détection de défauts ; Prise de décision ; Expertise ; Analyse du travail